In 1959 James Terrell and Roger Penrose, independently, pointed out that
the visual appearance of a fast-moving object is quite different
from its measured shape.
The visual appearance of a moving sphere is circular, and not
contracted along its direction of motion, whatever its speed.
Consider first the situation of a stationary sphere. Let
be
the three-vector from the center of the sphere to an inertial receiver at the
origin, and let the sphere subtend an angle
at the receiver. Photons emitted from
the outline of the sphere have frequency four-vectors , with
. If a photon appears to the receiver
to come from the outline of the sphere, then
necessarily satisfies the geometric equation
6.6
where
is a spacelike four-vector in the receiver’s frame. For the stationary
receiver, outline events are characterized by condition (6.6).
To another inertial receiver
(e.g., aboard a fast spacecraft), who sees
the sphere in the direction
, photons arrive from
directions
. Because the
Minkowski product in (6.6) is an invariant, the same condition for
outline events holds. Therefore, photons appear to the moving receiver to
come from a sphere with outline subtending an angle
.
Fig.6.2.Comparison of the measured
length contraction of a globe versus its visual appearance, as viewed from a
distance of three diameters of the globe from the eye to the red cross [7].
If the second receiver moves with the speed
parallel to
away from the sphere, we have
and
. Calculating the ratio
from the definition of the four-vector
(or by a Lorentz transformation), one obtains the
following relation between the subtended angles:
6.7
So
as
. As the receiver
accelerates away from the sphere, the outline grows until it fills the whole
sky, apart from a small hole directly ahead.
To a moving receiver, a sphere still has a circular outline, but
of a different size (Penrose, 1959). The sphere is the only geometrical
shape that appears the same to all receivers.
The result (6.7) is just one other form of the relativistic
aberration formula(6.4).