\( \newcommand{\bs}{\boldsymbol}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}} \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}} \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}} \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\bean}{\begin{eqnarray*}} \newcommand{\eean}{\end{eqnarray*}}
\newcommand{\la}{\label} \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\half}{{\scriptstyle \frac{1}{2}}}
\newcommand{\third}{{\scriptstyle \frac{1}{3}}}
\newcommand{\bli}[2]{\begin{list}{#1}{\itemsep=0.0cm \topsep=0.0cm
\partopsep=0.0cm #2}} \newcommand{\eli}{\end{list}}
\newtheorem{problem}{Problem}[chapter]
\newcommand{\bprob}{\begin{problem}} \newcommand{\eprob}{\end{problem}}\)
XII. Einstein-Cartan Theory
In the usual procedure Noether identities are obtained by
implementing symmetries, in the present case diffeomorphisms and
local Lorentz transformations, in the action. The result would then
imply the Bianchi identities (12.13,14) and the dynamical equations
(12,13,14). However, since these dynamical equations have already
been established, the shorter alternative is to derive the Noether
identities laws therefrom. By some algebraic manipulations one then
obtains the differential Noether identities of the
Einstein-Cartan theory:
\[{\text{D}}{{\mathbf{G}}_a} =
{\mathbf{T}}_a^b \wedge {{\mathbf{G}}_b} -
\frac{1}{2}{\bs{\mathcal{R}}}_a^{bc} \wedge {{\mathbf{S}}_{bc}}\]
\[{\text{D}}{{\mathbf{S}}_{ab}}
= {{\mathbf{e}}_b} \wedge {{\mathbf{G}}_a} - {{\mathbf{e}}_a} \wedge
{{\mathbf{G}}_b}\]
These equations look much like balance equations for
energy-momentum and angular momentum; this will be further explored
in Conservation Laws. For
vanishing torsion, GRT is recovered as shown in (12.15). In this
limit equation (12.17) enforces the symmetry of the Einstein tensor
which is conserved on account of (12.16). As an aside it may be is
mentioned that in the limit of zero torsion and curvature the above
Noether equations reduce to the conservation laws of energy-momentum
and angular momentum in Minkowski spacetime.
Notes
- The 1-form fields appearing in (12.16) are defined as the
contractions
\[{\mathbf{T}}_b^a: = {{\mathbf{e}}_b} \cdot {{\mathbf{T}}^a}
= T_{bc}^a{{\mathbf{e}}^c} \quad {\bs{\mathcal{R}}}_c^{ab} : =
{{\mathbf{e}}_c} \cdot {{\bs{\mathcal{R}}}^{ab}} =
\mathcal{R}_{cd}^{ab}{{\mathbf{e}}^d}\]
- Since ${{\mathbf{G}}_a}$ is a 3-form, $({{\mathbf{T}}^b}
\wedge {{\mathbf{G}}_b})$ is a 5-form, hence vanishes
identically. By contracting with ${{\mathbf{e}}_a}$ and working
out the inner product with the algebraic rule (E.1), one finds
that the right-hand sides of (12.13) and (12.16) are equivalent.
- To arrive at (12.17), one may use (E.2d) and the auxiliary
formula
\[{{\mathbf{e}}^k} \wedge {{\mathbf{G}}_a} = -
\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\bs{\eta }}_{ab}} \wedge
{{\bs{\mathcal{R}}}^{bk}} + {{\bs{\eta }}_{ca}} \wedge
{{\bs{\mathcal{R}}}^{kc}} + \delta _a^k{{\bs{\eta }}_{bc}}
\wedge {{\bs{\mathcal{R}}}^{bc}}} \right)\]